A recent short film The Disappearance of Willie Bingham has really taken the people in the real shock, have a look at its plot and ending explained
Despite having to slog through a lot of garbage to get to this Australian psychological horror piece, it was well worth it. The film is a short realist piece about a bureaucracy gone outrageously monstrous, and it appeals to the lowest common denominator of Western cultural ethics.
The Disappearance of Willie Bingham movie plot story and ending explained and where to watch online
“The Disappearance of Willie Bingham”-2015 (YouTube)
— 👻Kasey👻 (@bastylefilegirl) October 25, 2023
Short film: The Disappearance of Willie Bingham ⚠️
Story: Imagine if the punishment for r*pe and murd*r was not de*th penalty or life imprisonment, but the series of amputation of the body piece by piece and the victim's family gets to decide how far the surgery will go until… pic.twitter.com/O8TCYUxNam
— 𝕏 (@GopeshKhetan) October 25, 2023
The State of Victoria has chosen inmate Willie Bingham (Kevin Dee) to test out a new form of punishment for the involuntary manslaughter of a child. Bingham’s victim’s family can participate in the punishment by demanding that he undergo a series of amputations while they watch. Tim Ferris, who plays the father of the victim, has asked that Bingham have his left hand severed first.
After this amputation, Bingham is taken on a tour of elementary, middle, and high schools by his prison supervisor George Morton (Gregory J Fryer). And the police to show young criminals that they, too, face amputation as a result of their actions. As time goes on, Bingham loses more and more of himself. First his right hand, then his left leg, and eventually his organs. The victim’s sisters constantly ditch him after surgeries, and their father looks increasingly unkempt. With each surgery, Bingham’s mental health declines until he is fully traumatized, shut down, and unable to communicate.
Brilliant Acting in The Disappearance of Willie Bingham
Dee’s portrayal of Bingham, despite the fact that he may be innocent of multiple counts related to the rape and death of the minor victim, is heartbreakingly pitiful. Bingham has no control over his punishment and is caught in the web of a relentless. And deranged prison bureaucracy that seems to have a life of its own.
No one in the film takes ultimate responsibility for starting the Kafkaesque machine system. That physically devours all serious crime inmates. Bingham becomes a mere shell by the end of the film.
The film’s effectiveness stems in large part from its realism and veracity. All the characters are archetypes, and viewers will have little trouble relating to any of them. Although the story is fresh and engaging, it can’t go on for more than 15 minutes because of its inexorable progression.
Philosophy questions about the State’s role in providing justice to victims, setting sentence levels and types, and taking on (or contracting out) the responsibility of incarcerating and punishing criminals are essential to the success of a film of this genre. The film also needs to make a statement about the kind of society that would allow a cruel punishment system that plays on people’s baser instincts for vengeance and punishment to flourish. The movie can be viewed on YouTube.