Court prevents Aesha Mukerji from making disparaging remarks in response to Shikhar Dhawan claims that his ex-wife threatened to ruin his career
The Court has responded to Dhawan’s claims.
Aesha Mukerji, Shikhar Dhawan’s ex-wife, was recently ordered by a New Delhi family court to stop writing or publishing anything to the press or social media that may damage the cricketer’s reputation. If Mukerji has any difficulties with Dhawan, Justice Harish Kumar has urged her to voice them to the authorities in both India and Australia.
Cricketer Shikhar Dhawan is paying ex-wife Aesha Mukerji $20,000 in monthly allowance as she threatens to ruin his career
If Mukerji has any issues with Dhawan, Patiala House Court Judge Justice Harish Kumar has urged her to voice them to the authorities in India and Australia. According to the judge’s ruling, no one has the authority to damage another person’s reputation because everyone values reputation.
It was a tough week for Feminists and SIMPs.
It started with @Nawazuddin_S , then #SapnaChaudhary , then @vinodkambli349 and now @SDhawan25 is accusing his wife Aesha Mukerji of threatened him to ruin his image and career. No one will be spared.#GenderBiasedLaws pic.twitter.com/nu9W6nrgv5— NCMIndia Council For Men Affairs (@NCMIndiaa) February 6, 2023
I can see criminal cases coming on @SDhawan25 very soon pic.twitter.com/H0bHkZ38E1
— Deepika Narayan Bhardwaj (@DeepikaBhardwaj) February 5, 2023
What was the Judge’s verdict?
According to Justice Harish Kumar, a person’s reputation is prized by all and regarded as the ultimate form of property because, unlike physical possessions, it cannot be repaired once it has been damaged. Therefore, it must be safeguarded. However, it is also true that if someone has a legitimate grievance against them, they are free to express it to the appropriate authorities.
Furthermore, Justice Harish Kumar ruled that as the information was already in the public domain, Mukerji was not permitted to share any private information about Dhawan with her friends or family or the general public. Mukerji must therefore get in touch with the appropriate authorities if she encounters any new problems.
Because of this, the judge added that Aesha is restrained until further order from disseminating any of her complaints against Dhawan, her account of the conflict at hand, or the alleged defamatory and false material against him, to social media, print media, or any other forum or to friends, relatives, or co-workers of the parties.
Aman Hingorani, Dhawan’s attorney, entered a plea in the case, noting that the batsman was charged with mistreating Mukerji by failing to give her a reasonable stipend. Dhawan’s attorney, however, claimed the batsman has been regularly providing her with a sum of Australian $17,500 each month (inclusive of mortgage payments) in addition to paying for school fees and other expenses.