Rampat Yadav of Noida was arrested after making comments against Amit Shah and Prime Minister Narendra Modi as his video went viral
In a recent incident highlighting the legal consequences of online expression, Rampat Yadav, a 49-year-old from Noida faced legal issues for allegedly making “objectionable” remarks against Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah.
Who is Rampat Yadav arrested by Noida Police for objectionable comments on PM Modi and Amit Shah in viral video on Twitter
49 year old Rampat Yadav, a resident of Hoshiarpur village under Sector 49 Police Station limits, was held after a video of his comments surfaced on social media.
“Accused Rampat Yadav was arrested as a video clip of his objectionable comments about the prime minister, the home minister and the UttarPradesh chief minister went viral on social media platforms and the police took note of the episode on its own,” a police spokesperson said.
An FIR was lodged at the local police station under Indian Penal Code section 505 (B) (spreading rumour to cause rift in society) and section 67 of the Information Technology Act.
A 49-year-old #Noida resident was arrested for allegedly making "objectionable" remarks on Prime Minister #NarendraModi, Union Home Minister #AmitShah, and #UttarPradesh Chief Minister #YogiAdityanath.
Rampat Yadav, a resident of #Hoshiarpur village under Sector 49 Police… pic.twitter.com/xwkwD2uteq
— Hate Detector 🔍 (@HateDetectors) December 26, 2023
Noida Man Jailed Over "Objectionable" Remarks Against PM, Amit Shah
A 49-year-old Rampat Yadav from Noida Uttar Pradesh, was arrested for allegedly making "objectionable" remarks on Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Home Minister Amit Shah, and Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister… pic.twitter.com/kB694RO8HM
— TheKantap.com (@Thekantap1) December 25, 2023
The incident gained attention when a video containing the comments of Rampat Yadav surfaced on various social media platforms, prompting swift action by local authorities.
Rampat Yadav, a former employee in the transport sector was taken into custody following the filing of an FIR at the local police station. The charges against him include Section 505(B) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) which relates to spreading rumors to cause a rift in society and Section 67 of the Information Technology (IT) Act, dealing with the publication or transmission of obscene material in electronic form.
The arrest was not merely a reaction to public outcry; rather, the police proactively responded to the viral video containing the alleged objectionable remarks. This incident highlights the increasing scrutiny of online content and the legal consequences individuals may face for statements deemed harmful or offensive.
Rampat Yadav, residing in Hoshiarpur village under Sector 49 Police Station limits was brought before a magisterial court where legal proceedings unfolded. This marks a significant development in the case and emphasizes the active role of the legal system in addressing instances where online expressions are perceived as a threat to public order or individual reputations.
It is noteworthy that Yadav expressed regret for his comments, as reported by local police personnel. This acknowledgment of regret raises questions about the delicate balance between freedom of speech and the responsibility that accompanies expressing opinions, particularly in a digital age where information can spread rapidly.
The swift action taken by law enforcement serves as a reminder of the evolving landscape of free speech in the context of social media. As online platforms continue to play a pivotal role in shaping public discourse, the legal framework adapts to address potential challenges arising from online expression that may incite discord or harm public figures.
This case underscores the intersection of technology and law, with the application of the Information Technology Act in addressing online offenses. Section 67 of the IT Act specifically addresses the transmission of obscene material in electronic form, showcasing legislative measures in place to regulate digital content.